A Comparison Report on Efficient Types of Testing

Authors

  • Thulasiram K Dept.of Computer Science, S.V.University, India
  • Ramakrishna S Dept.of Computer Science, S.V.University, India
  • Chitti Babu P Dept. of MCA, APGCCS, India, Country

Keywords:

Comparision Testing, Priority Based Testing, Risk Based Testing, Critical Based Testing, Resource Based Testing

Abstract

: In this paper, by comparing various types of testing, a framework was created for an efficient and cost effective testing. For the research, one of the largest digital marketing companies was considered. The company wanted to analyze their business to identify which website is generating more revenue. To analyze the business, the company has developed an analytical tool. To ensure the efficiency of the product and to compete with other analytical tool vendors in the market, they keep enhancing the product and release it frequently. To test these analytical product for frequent releases the company came up with an idea to compare the types of testing and decide the right testing methodology that will give the best output with less turnaround and reduced cost. In this approach four types of testing were considered, them being Priority based, Critical based, Risk based and Resource based testing.

References

T. Mens and T. Tourwe, “ A survey of software refactoring,” Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol.30, no. 2, pp. 126-139, Feb 2004

http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/static_routing.html, date last viewed: 2016-1-17.

A. Leitner, I. Ciupa and B. Meyer,“Reconciling Manual and Automated Testing: the AutoTest Experience”, Proc. 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp: 261-271, January 2007.

M. Ali, S. Mushtaq and N. Arshad., “Priority-Based Automated Testing of Web Application”, Proc. IEEE Conference on Communication and Information Technology,2012.

Felix Redmill in „Professional Tester“, April 2003. www.professional-tester.com

Tom DeMarco and Tim Lister, "Waltzing with Bears: Managing Risk on Software Projects”, 2003.www.riskbasedtesting.com

IEEE Standard 1044.1-2002: Guide to Classification for Software Anomalies

IEEE Std. 16085 Standard for Software Engineering -Software Life Cycle Processes -Risk Management You find them at sales@ieee.org

Information Systems Examinations Board. Practitioner Certificate in Software Testing - Guidelines and Syllabus. Version 1.1. British Computer Society, Swindon, 2001

Gerrard P and Thompson N. Risk-Based E-Business Testing. Artech House, Norwood,2002.

Kahneman D and Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.Econometrica, 47, 263-291, 1979.

Redmill. Risk Analysis - a subjective process. Engineering Management Journal, 12, 2,91-96, 2002.

Moseley, C. E., Gettings, R. M., & Cooper, R. (2002). Havingityourway: Under-standing state individual budgeting strategies . Washington, DC: National Associa-tion of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services.

Campbell, E. M., Fortune, J. R., Frisch, J. K., Heal, L. W., Heinlein, K. B., Lynch, R. M., et al. (2005). Predictors of expenditures in western states. In R. J. Stancliffe and K.C. Lakin (Eds.), Costs and outcomes of community services for people withIntellectual disabilities (pp. 175–201). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

Kaner, Cem and Walter P. Bond “Software Engineering Metrics: What Do They Measure and How Do We Know?.”

Weinberg, Gerald M. “Quality Software Management, Volume 2: First-Order Measurement.”.

P. Chitti Babu and K.C.K. Bharathi, “Assessment of Maintainability factor”, International Journal of Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology Research, Vol. 3, Issue.3,29-42, 2013

C.Mallikarjuna and P.Chitti Babu,” A Report on the Analysis of Software Maintenance and Impact on Quality Factors”, International Journal of Engineering Sciences Research-IJESR, Vol.05,1485-89,2014

Downloads

Published

2025-11-11

How to Cite

[1]
K. Thulasiram, S. Ramakrishna, and P. Chitti Babu, “A Comparison Report on Efficient Types of Testing”, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Eng., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 195–202, Nov. 2025.

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016): IJCSE April Edition

Section

Review Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.