Effectiveness of Knowledge Management in Software Industries – An Empirical Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i6.358363Keywords:
Knowledge Management, Software Industries, Employees, Questionnaire, Organizational Effectiveness, Structural Equation ModellingAbstract
The main aim of this study is to analyse the effectiveness of Knowledge Management in Software Industries. The Knowledge Management dimensions which could influence the organizational effectiveness have been identified. Metric to measure the relationship between these Knowledge Management dimensions has been developed. To test the hypotheses, a sample size of 254 software company employees has been collected and Partial Least Square technique of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) has been used to investigate the empirical relationships between the different identified dimensions. Questionnaires were distributed to 300 employees of different software companies through Google Form. Response rate of 72% (254 employees responded) was achieved in the survey. The testing of hypotheses justified that in terms of organizational effectiveness, the identified dimensions of Knowledge Management are the critical success factors. Implications of the study would enable the Human Resource managers to make their Knowledge Management process more powerful for the enhancement of effectiveness of the organization. It may not be possible to generalize the results for the full extent, as the study limits itself to the number of software industries. All the limitations of statistical testing and modelling and simulation are applicable to this research.
References
[1]. Liebowitz, J. (1999). “Key ingredients to the success of an organization’s knowledge management strategy”, Knowledge and Process Management, 6(1), 37–40.
[2]. Asish O. Mathew, Lewlyn L. R. Rodrigues, Alapati Vittaleswar “Human Factors & Knowledge Management : A System Dynamics Based Analysis”, Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2012.
[3]. Kimiz Dalkir “Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice” McGill University, 2005.
[4]. Nonaka I., Byosiere P., Borucki, C. C., & Konno N. “Organizational knowledge creation theory: a first comprehensive test”. International Business Review, 3(4), 337-351, 1994.
[5]. Tracy A. Hurley, Carolyn W. Green “Knowledge Management And The Nonprofit Industry: A Within And Between Approach”. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 2005.
[6]. Aurum, A., Daneshgar, F., & Ward, J. “Investigating Knowledge Management practices in software development organisations” – An Australian experience. Information and Software Technology, 50(6), 511-533, 2008.
[7]. William R. King, “Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning”, University of Pittsburgh, 2009.
[8]. Maen Alhawari, Arab Academy for Financial and Banking Sciences, Jordan, “The Importance of The Four Knowledge Management Styles To Industry: Using The HSD Post Hoc Test” Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Vol. 8, No. 3, September 2007.
[9]. Azad, N., & Mehrabi Majolan, E. “A study on effects of knowledge management on organizational entrepreneurship”: A case study of educational system. Management Science Letters, 2(8), 2711–2716, 2012.
[10]. Davenport, T.H, and Prusak, L. “Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know”, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
[11]. Aybüke Aurum, Ross Jeffery, Claes Wohlin, Meliha Handzic, “Managing Software Engineering Knowledge” 2003.
[12]. Hung, Y. C., Huang, S. M., & Lin, Q. P. “Critical factors in adopting a knowledge management system for the pharmaceutical industry”. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(2), 164-183, 2005.
[13]. Sabry M. Abd-El-Fattah, Hessa Abdulrahman Fakhroo, “The Relationship among Paternal Psychological Control and Adolescents’ Perfectionism and Self-Esteem: A Partial Least Squares Path Analysis”, Psychology, Vol.3 No.5, May 24, 2012.
[14]. Barclay D.; Higgins, C.; Thompson, R. “The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as illustration”. Technol. Stud., 2, 285–309, 1995.
[15]. Diamantopoulos, A.; Siguaw, J.A. “Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration”. Br. J. Manag.,17, 263–282, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
