Intrusion Detection and Violation of Compliance by Monitoring the Network

Authors

  • R. Shenbaga Priya Department Of Computer Science with specialization in Network, Vel Tech MultiTech Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Chennai, India
  • V. Anusha Department Of Computer Science with specialization in Network, Vel Tech MultiTech Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Chennai, India
  • N. Kumar Department Of Computer Science with specialization in Network, Vel Tech MultiTech Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Chennai, India

Keywords:

Intrusion Detection, Navie Bayes Algorithm, Spam Filtering, Dynamic Tuning Mechanism

Abstract

Network and security of system has vital role in data communication environment. Web services and networks can be crashed on attempting many possible ways on forwarding by hackers or intruders. It causes malicious rapt in which it needs a technique called Intrusion Detection System through Spam Filtering. Thus gives the protection to networks. It can be done by using Open Source Network Intrusion Detection System called Snort. The process of arranging the e-mail with framed criteria called Spam Filtering. Proposed System, a Machine Learning Algorithm called Simple Probabilistic Navie Bayes Classifier used to detect the intrusion. Based on its content Probability of Spam messages can be calculated in Navie Bayes Classifier by learning it from spam and Good mail which results a robust, efficient anti-spam approach and adaption. Sniffing the packet and Fed it as input to Navie Bayes Classifier will give Test Dataset. Depends on spam and intrusion probability, the email is been classified as good or spam.

References

Androutsopoulos, J. Koutsias, V. Chandrinos, and D. Dpyropoulos, ‘An experimental comparison of Naive Naive Bayes and keyword-based anti-spam filtering with personal e-mail messages’ In 23rd Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ISBN:1-58113-226-3, page no.160-167 , 2000.

Blum, T. Mitchell, ‘Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training’, in Proc. Workshop on Computational Learning Theory,ISBN:1-58113-057-0, page no.92-100, 1998.

Daniel Grossman, Pedro Domingos University of Washington, Seattle, WA ‘Learning Naive Bayes network classifiers by maximizing conditional likelihood’ 21st international conference on Machine learning table of contents Banff, Alberta, Canada, Learning (IDEAL04), UK ISBN: 1-58113-838-5, page no.361-368, 2004.

H. Drucker, D. Wu, and V.N. Vapnik, ‘Support vector machines for spam categorization ’IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 10, no. 5, page no. 1048-1054 , 1999.

Jonathan Palmer, ‘Naive Bayes Classification for Intrusion Detection using Live Packet Capture’, data mining in bioinformatics, 2011.

J. Provost ‘Naive-Bayes vs. rule-learning in classification of e-mail’ The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Computer Sciences Rep, AI-TR .99-284, 1999.

M Rogati, Y Yang, ‘High-Performing Feature Selection for Text Classification', CSD, Carnegie Mellon University, CIKM’02, ISBN: 1-58113-492-4, page no.659-661, 2002.

G. Sakkis, I. Androutsopoulos, G. Paliouras, ‘A memory-based approach to anti-spam filtering,’ Information Retrieval, vol. 6, no.1, page no. 49-73, 2003.

F. Sebastiani, ‘Machine learning in automated text categorization’ ACM Computing Surveys I vol. 34, no.1, page no.1-47, 2002.

X.-L. Wang, I. Cloete, ‘Learning to classify e-mail: A survey’ In Proc. of the 4th Int. Conference. On Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Guangzhou.vol. 9, ISBN: 0-7803-9091-1, page no.5716-5719, 2005.

Downloads

Published

2014-03-31

How to Cite

[1]
R. S. Priya, V. Anusha, and N. Kumar, “Intrusion Detection and Violation of Compliance by Monitoring the Network”, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Eng., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 84–91, Mar. 2014.

Issue

Section

Research Article