TaxoFinder A Graph-Based Technique for Taxonomy Learning

Authors

  • Ashokrao Kadam A Dept. of Computer Science & Engg. M.S. Bidve Engineering College, Latur
  • Guruling Swami S Dept. of Computer Science & Engg. M.S. Bidve Engineering College, Latur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v8i4.129132

Keywords:

Knowledge searching, Taxonomy learnin, axonomy, TaxoFinder, keyword phrases

Abstract

Taxonomy is an essential process for gaining, sending, and classifying information, and also creating and using applications in several fields. To minimize humans, work to form the taxonomy learning from scratch and then increase the consistency of the taxonomy, now we suggest an approach to taxonomy learning, called TaxoFinder. TaxoFinder does three stages to construct a taxonomy automatically. Next, it distinguishes notions which are specific to the domain from a corpus of text. Later, it develops a graph describing how these definitions are connected at once depending on their co- occurrences. We will provide a technique for calculating strengths of associative between the concepts as the main method in TaxoFinder, which proves the strength and how tightly they have associated in the graphs, Using their similarities and spatial differences in sentences. Then lastly, have the TaxoFinder which uses a graph-analytical algorithm to trigger a taxonomy. TaxoFinder attempts to construct a taxonomy in such a way that to create a taxonomy, it enhances the associative strengths between the concepts in the graph. We test TaxoFinder on three separate domains using the gold standard evaluation: Mass-meetings emergency response, autism research and disorder domains. We evaluate TaxoFinder as the very effective subsumption method in this development, and it reveals that TaxoFinder was an efficient solution that successfully outperforms the subsumption process.

References

[1] K. Meijer, F. Frasincar, and F. Hogenboom, “A semantic approach for extracting domain taxonomies from text,” Decision Support Syst., vol. 62, pp. 78–93, 2014.

[2] W. Wong, W. Liu, and M. Bennamoun, “Ontology learning from text: A look back and into the future,” ACM Comput. Surv. vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 20:1–20:36, Sep. 2012.

[3] M. A. Hearst, “Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora,” in Proc. 14th Conf. Comput. Linguistics, 1992, vol. 2, pp. 539–545.

[4] P. Pantel and M. Pennacchiotti, “Espresso: Leveraging generic patterns for automatically harvesting semantic relations,” in Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Comput. Linguistics 44th Annu. Meet. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, 2006, pp. 113–120.

[5] X. Liu, Y. Song, S. Liu, and H. Wang, “Automatic taxonomy construction from keywords,” in Proc. 18th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, 2012, pp. 1433–1441.

[6] E.-A. Dietz, D. Vandic, and F. Frasincar, “TaxoLearn: A semantic approach to domain taxonomy learning,” in Proc. IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Joint Conf. Web Intell. Intell. Agent Technol., 2012, pp. 58–65.

[7] W. Wang, P. Mamaani Barnaghi, and A. Bargiela, “Probabilistic topic models for learning terminological ontologies,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1028–1040, Jul. 2010.

[8] Z. Kozareva and E. Hovy, “A semi-supervised method to learn and construct taxonomies using the web,” in Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Process., 2010, pp. 1110–1118.

[9] P. Velardi, S. Faralli, and R. Navigli, “OntoLearn Reloaded: A graph-based algorithm for taxonomy induction, “Comput. Linguistics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 665–707, 2013.

[10] Y.-B. Kang, P. D. Haghighi, and F. Burstein, “CFinder: An Intelligent Key Concept Finder from Text for Ontology Development,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 4494–4504, 2014.

[11] T. H. Cormen, C. Stein, R. L. Rivest, and C. E. Leiserson, Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd Ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2001.

[12] K. Dellschaft and S. Staab, “Strategies for the evaluation of ontology learning,” in Proc. Conf. Ontol. Learn. Population: Bridging Gap Between Text Knowl, 2008, pp. 253–272.

[13] F. M. Suchanek, G. Ifrim, and G. Weikum, “Combining linguistic and statistical analysis to extract relations from web documents,” in Proc. 12th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, 2006, pp. 712–717.

[14] S. P. Ponzetto and M. Strube, “Taxonomy induction based on a collaboratively built knowledge repository,” Artif. Intell. , vol. 175, no. 9-10, pp. 1737–1756, Jun. 2011.

[15] A. B. Rios-Alvarado, I. Lopez-Arevalo, and V. J. Sosa-Sosa, “Learning concept hierarchies from textual resources for ontologies construction, " “Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 40, no. 15, pp. 5907–5915, Nov. 2013.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.26438/ijcse/v8i4.129132
Published: 2020-04-30

How to Cite

[1]
A. Ashokrao Kadam and S. Guruling Swami, “TaxoFinder A Graph-Based Technique for Taxonomy Learning”, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 129–132, Apr. 2020.

Issue

Section

Technical Article