Performance Evaluation of Routing for Wireless Sensor Network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v8i4.7074Keywords:
AODV, DSDV, DSR, OLSR, WSNAbstract
Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is consisting of independent and distributed sensors to monitor physical or environmental conditions, such as temperature, sound, pressure, etc. Routing protocols represent an essential aspect of the performance of mobile wireless networks. This paper presents a comparative analysis between several routing algorithms and their impact on the performance of WSN. In this paper, we used NS-2 to simulate and implemented routing protocols like Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) protocol, Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) protocol, Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) protocol and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol for many numbers of nodes. We compared network parameters, analyzed and evaluated the performance with comparing the end to- end delay, packet delivery fraction (PDF), throughput and packet loss rate. As the number of nodes increases and the network expands, the performance of the AODV protocol obtains better results than the other protocols.
References
[1] Thangaraj, Jaisingh, and Shilpee Kumari. "Evaluating feasibility of using Wireless Sensor Network in agricultural land through simulation of DSR, AOMDV, AODV, DSDV protocol." In 2016 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), pp. 301-305. IEEE, 2016.
[2] Perkins, Charles E., and Elizabeth M. Royer. "Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing." In Proceedings WMCSA`99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 90-100. IEEE, 1999.
[3] Amirthalingam, Krishnakumar. "Improved leach: A modified leach for wireless sensor network." In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computer Applications (ICACA), pp. 255-258. IEEE, 2016.
[4] Johnson, David B., and David A. Maltz. "Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks." In Mobile computing, pp. 153-181. Springer, Boston, MA, 1996.
[5] Li, Xiaohui, and Junfeng Wang. "A Generous Cooperative Routing Protocol for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Networks." TIIS 10, no. 11, pp. 5322-5342, 2016.
[6] Imran, Mohd, and Mohammad Abdul Qadeer. "Evaluation study of performance comparison of topology based routing protocol, AODV and DSDV in MANET." In 2016 International Conference on Micro-Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering (ICMETE), pp. 207-211. IEEE, 2016.
[7] Sureshkumar, A., V. Ellappan, and K. Manivel. "A comparison analysis of DSDV and AODV routing protocols in mobile AD HOC networks." In 2017 Conference on Emerging Devices and Smart Systems (ICEDSS), pp. 234-237. IEEE, 2017.
[8] Ali, Tareq Emad, Layth A. Khalil al Dulaimi, and Yamaan E. Majeed. "Review and performance comparison of VANET protocols: AODV, DSR, OLSR, DYMO, DSDV & ZRP." In 2016 Al-Sadeq International Conference on Multidisciplinary in IT and Communication Science and Applications (AIC-MITCSA), pp. 1-6. IEEE, 2016.
[9] Tseng, Fan-Hsun, Hua-Pei Chiang, and Han-Chieh Chao. "Black Hole along with Other Attacks in MANETs: A Survey." Journal of Information Processing Systems 14, no. 1, pp:55-62, 2018.
[10] Aggarwal, Neha, Teglovy Singh Chohan, Karamveer Singh, Rajan Vohra, and Shalini Bahel. "Relative Analysis of AODV & DSDV Routing Protocols for MANET based on NS2." In 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), pp. 3500-3503. IEEE, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
