A Review on Ontology Languages

Authors

  • Revathy R Department of Computer Applications, Idhaya College for Women, Kumbakonam, Tamil nadu, India

Keywords:

Ontology, RDF, OWL

Abstract

Ontology languages play key roles for representing and process info regarding the important world for the rising linguistics net. Efforts are created to develop varied metaphysics languages. Every metaphysics language provides totally different communicatory power and conjointly process quality for reasoning. Metaphysics question languages were developed to question the data outlined by these metaphysics languages and reasoning systems. We have a tendency to conduct a study to match their communicatory power, efficiency, and scalability and best performing arts scenario

References

[1] McBride, P.H.a.B., RDF Semantics. W3C,2004.

[2] Mike Dean, G.S., Sean Bechhofer, Frank van Harmelen, Jim Hendler, Ian Horrocks, Deborah L. McGuinness, Peter F. Patel-Schneider and Lynn Andrea Stein, OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, ed. W3C. 2004.

[3] Ian Horrocks, P.F.P.-S., Harold Boley,SaidTabet,BenjaminGrosof and Mike Dean, SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. available at http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL- 20040521/,2004.

[4] Horrocks, I., DAML+OIL: a Description Logic for the Semantic Web. the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 2002. 25(1): pp.4-9.

[5] Michael K. Smith, C.W.a.D.L.M., OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. W3C,2004.

[6] Becker, M.Y. Godel`s Completeness Theorem.in Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge.28.2.2003.

[7] Seaborne, A., Jena Tutorial A Programmer`s Introduction to RDQL. HP Labs,2002.

[8] Richard Fikes, P.H., and Ian Horrocks, OWL-QL – A Language for Deductive Query Answering onthe Semantic Web.KSL 03-14, 2003.

[9] Voronkov, A.R.a.A., Vampire 1.1. IJCAR, 2001. LNAI 2083: pp.376-380.

[10] Palmer, S.B., The Semantic Web: the introduction. W3C, 2001.39

[11] Frank Manola, E.M.a.B.M., RDF Primer. W3C,2004.

[12] Brian McBride, J.G.a.D.B., RDF Test Cases. W3C, 2004.

[13] ]D. McGuinness and F van Harmelen (eds) OWL Web Ontology Language Overview http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-features-20030331/

[14] M. Dean, G. Schreiber (eds), F. van Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. McGuinness, . Patel-Schneider, L. Stein, OWL Web Ontology Language Reference http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-ref-20030331/

[15] M. Smith, C.Welty, D. McGuinness, OWL Web Ontology Language Guide http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-guide-20030331/P. Patel-Schneider, P. Hayes, I. Horrocks, OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-semantics-20030331/

Downloads

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

[1]
R. Revathy, “A Review on Ontology Languages”, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Eng., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 212–216, Nov. 2025.

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019): IJCSE Special Issue Feb Edition

Section

Review Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.