A Study on The Factors That Influence the Acceptance of LMS’s In Higher Educational Institution’s
Keywords:
Moodle (Modular Object Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment), Higher Educational Institutions, learning Management system, E-mail, Technology acceptance model, Structural equation modellingAbstract
This study is designed to investigate the acceptance of Learning Management Systems (Moodle) in Higher Educational Institutions (HEI’s) of Oman. Due to the technological developments the importance of using learning Management system in Higher Educational Institutes (HEI’s) are increasing day by day. This study is to investigate the acceptance of Learning Management Systems in different HEI’s of Sultanate of Oman. To investigate the factors that influence the use of LMS’s in HEI’s the 5-point likert questionnaire has been made and distributed electronically through e-mail and Social media applications. The questionnaire sent to the students of different HEI’s of Sultanate. Data were collected from 137 respondents belongs to various HEI’s in which 132 are the valid responses. The questionnaire consists of 5 demographic question and 13 survey questions. The variables used in this research are perceived playfulness, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use, attitude, and intention to use. The research is based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The Structural equation modelling (SEM) technique is used to evaluate the causal model and to extreme the validity of model. This research paper tested the 7 hypotheses
References
[1] About Moodle. (n.d.) retrieved from https://docs.moodle.org/32/en/About_Moodle#Built_for_learning.2C_globally
[2] Adeyemo, S. A., Adedoja, G. O., & Adelore, O. (2013). Mobile technology: Implications of its application on
[3] learning. Open Praxis, 5(3), 249-254.
[4] Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
[5] In: Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[6] Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.
[7] Chung, C., & Ackerman, D. (2015). Student reactions to classroom management technology: learning styles and attitudes toward moodle. Journal of Education for Business, 90(4), 217-223.
[8] Davis Jr, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems:
[9] Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
[10] Davis, F. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, [18] 13(3), 1989. 319-339.
[11] Fowler Jr, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods: Sage publications.
[12] Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS
[13] quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
[14] Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human—
[15] computer interaction. The Journal of psychology, 128(4), 381-391.
[16] Gupta, M., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government information
[17] quarterly, 20(4), 365-387.
[18] Gupta, M., & Goyal, E. (2011). Applicability of Mobile Learning Engine-Moodle in Computer Application Course.Journal of Information Technology Management, 22(3), 51-58.
[19] He, D., Lu, Y., & Zhou, D. (2008). Empirical study of consumers` purchase intentions in C2C electronic commerce.
[20] Tsinghua Science & Technology, 13(3), 287-292.
[21] Heeks, R. (2006). Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation. International journal of medical
[22] informatics, 75(2), 125-137.
[23] Horton, W. (2011). E-learning by design: John Wiley & Sons.
[24] Ho, C.L., & Dzeng, R.J. (2010). Construction Safety Training via E-Learning: Learning Effectiveness and User Satisfaction. Computers & Education, 55 (2), 858-867.
[25] Hsu, H. H. (2013). The acceptance of Moodle: An empirical study based on UTAUT. Creative Education, 3(08), 44.
[26] Hsu, H. H., & Chang, Y. Y. (2013). Extended TAM model: Impacts of convenience on acceptance and use of Moodle. Online Submission, 3(4), 211-218.
[27] Junco, R., & Mastrodicasa, J. (2007). Connecting to the net. generation: What higher education professionals need
[28] to know about today`s students: NASPA, Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education.
[29] Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3‐learning. Distance education, 29(2), 175-185.
[30] Kim, H., Kim, T., & Shin, S. (2009). Tourism Management, 30(null), 266.
[31] Klopping, I. M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 22(1), 35.
[32] Lin, F., Fofanah, S. S., & Liang, D. (2011). Assessing citizen adoption of e-Government initiatives in Gambia: A validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 271-279.
[33] Moodle Statistics. (n.d.) retrieved on (Apr 2017) from https://moodle.net/stats/
[34] Moodle Overview (n.d.) retrieved on (Apr 2017) from https://moodle.com/moodle-lms/
[35] Moodle Partners (n.d.) retrieved on (Apr 2017) from https://moodle.com/partners/
[36] Marin, S. T., Garcia, F. B., Torres, R. M., Vázquez, S. G., & Moreno, A. L. (2005). Implementation of a web-based
[37] educational tool for digital signal processing teaching using the technological acceptance model. IEEE Transactions
[38] on Education, 48(4), 632-641.
[39] Masa`deh, R. e., Obeidat, B. Y., & Tarhini, A. (2016). A Jordanian empirical study of the associations among
[40] transformational leadership, transactional leadership, knowledge sharing, job performance, and firm performance:
[41] A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Management Development, 35(5), 681-705.
[42] Ong, C.-S., Day, M.-Y., & Hsu, W.-L. (2009). The measurement of user satisfaction with question answering
[43] systems. Information & Management, 46(7), 397-403.
[44] Ong, C.-S., & Lai, J.-Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning
[45] acceptance. Computers in human behavior, 22(5), 816-829.
[46] Padilla-MeléNdez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender
[47] differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63, 306-317.
[48] Qiyao Zhu, Wentao Guo, Yan Hu, 2012.mobile learning in higher education. Bachelor’s thesis within Informatics business and IT Management,
[49] Susana, O., Juanjo, M., Eva, T., & Ana, I. (2015). Improving graduate Students` learning through the use of Moodle. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 604.
[50] Tarhini, A., Teo, T., & Tarhini, T. (2016). A cross-cultural validity of the E-learning Acceptance Measure (ElAM)
[51] in Lebanon and England: A confirmatory factor analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1269-1282.
[52] Venkatesh, V. (2000). Information Systems Research, 22(null), 342.
[53] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). MIS Quarterly, 27(null), 425.
[54] Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1992). Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace
[55] implications. MIS quarterly, 201-226.
[56] Wu, L., & Chen, J. L. (2005). An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), 784-808.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
