A Review of Hybrid Exploratory Testing Techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i1.851857Keywords:
Hybrid, exploratory, scenarios, testing, tourAbstract
Wildcat testing contains a mess of strategy related to it. It is a decent combination of structured thinking and race exploration that may be terribly powerful for locating bugs and substantiate correctness. This paper shows however the wildcat testing mentality is often combined with additional ancient scenario-based and scripted testing. This hybrid technique relaxes a lot of the rigidity unremarkably related to scripting and makes smart use of the wildcat testing steering bestowed. It additionally permits groups that square measure heavily unconditional in existing scripts to feature wildcat testing to their arsenal. Ancient state of affairs testing is incredibly seemingly to be a well-known idea for the reader. Several testers write or follow some type of script or end-to-end state of affairs once they perform manual testing. State of affairs testing is well-liked as a result of it lends confidence that the merchandise can faithfully perform the state of affairs for actual users. The additional the state of affairs reflects expected usage, the additional such confidence is gained. The additional part that wildcat testing lends to the current method is to inject variation into the state of affairs in order that a wider swath of the merchandise gets tested. Users can't be unnatural to merely execute the software package the manner we have a tendency to intend, therefore our testing ought to expand to hide these extra state of affairs variants.
References
[1] C. Agruss and B. Johnson. Ad hoc software testing, a perspective on exploration and improvisation. Technical report, Florida Institute of Technology, USA, April 2000.
[2] J. J. Ahonen, T. Junttila, and M. Sakkinen. Impacts of the organizational model on testing: Three industrial cases. Empirical Software Engineering, 9(4):275–296, 2004.
[3] P. Ammann and J. Offutt. Introduction to software testing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.
[4] C. Andersson and P. Runeson. Verification and validation in industry – a qualitative survey on the state of practice. In International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 2002), pages 37–47, 2002.
[5] J. Bach. Session-based test management. Software Testing and Quality Engineering Magazine, 2, 2000.
[6] J. Bach. Exploratory testing. In E. V. Veenendal, editor, The Testing Practitioner. UTN Publishers, 2005.
[7] E. Barnett-Page and J. Thomas. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC medical research methodology, 9(1):59, 2009.
[8] A. Bertolino. Software testing research: Achievements, challenges, dreams. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Future of Software Engineering (FOSE 2007), pages 85–103, 2007.
[9] P. Bourque and R. Dupuis. Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge (swebok). Technical report, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, California, 2004.
[10] L. C. Briand, Y. Labiche, and Q. Lin. Improving the coverage criteria of uml state machines using data flow analysis. Softw. Test., Verif. Reliab., 20(3):177–207, 2010.
[11] N. Britten, R. Campbell, C. Pope, J. Donovan, M. Morgan, and R. Pill. Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7(4):209–215, 2002.
[12] L. Copeland. A practitioner’s guide to software test design. Artech House, Boston, Mass., 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
