A Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm

Authors

  • Sathiya D Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India
  • Sonia SVE Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i12.875878

Keywords:

Supervised Machine Learning, Classifier, Error Rate

Abstract

Machine Learning is a process which begins with observations of data to make better decisions of new data in future. Machine Learning algorithms divides as Supervised Machine Learning, Unsupervised Machine Learning, Semi- Supervised Machine Learning and Reinforcement Learning. In this paper, we focus on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms especially its error rates. A Supervised learning algorithm analyses the training data and produces a classifier (conditional function), which can then be used for mapping test sets. We compare the various Supervised Machine Learning algorithms in terms of its error rates in this paper.

References

[1] Iqbal Muhammad and Zhu Yan, “Supervised Machine Learning Approaches: A Survey”, ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, Vol. 05, Issue. 03, pp. 946-952, 2015.

[2] Shai Shalev-Shwartz and Shai Ben-David, “Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms”, Cambridge University Press, 2014.

[3] Osisanwo F. Y, Akinsola J.E.T, Awodele O, Hinmikaiye J.O., Olakanmi O., Akinjobi J., “Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms: Classification and Comparison”, International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, Vol. 48, Issue. 3, pp. 128-138, 2017.

[4] V. Ilango, R. Subramanian, V. Vasudevan, “A Five Step Procedure for Outlier Analysis in Data Mining” European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 75, Issue. 3, pp. 327-339, 2012.

[5] Barbara D. Klein & Donald F. Rossin, “Data Quality in Linear Regression Models: Effect of Errors in Test Data and Errors in Training Data on Predictive Accuracy”, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, Informing Science, 1999.

[6] ISSN 1450-216X Vol.75 No.3 (2012), pp. 327-339 © Euro Journals Publishing, Inc. 2012

[7] http://www.europeanjournalofscientificresearch.com European Journal of Scientific Research

[8] ISSN 1450-216X Vol.75 No.3 (2012), pp. 327-339© Euro Journals Publishing, Inc. 2012

[9] http://www.europeanjournalofscientificresearch.com European Journal of Scientific Research

[10]ISSN 1450-216X Vol.75 No.3 (2012), pp. 327-339 © EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. 2012

[11] http://www.europeanjournalofscientificresearch.com European Journal of Scientific Research

[12] Felipe Schneider Costa, Maria Marlene De Souza Pires and Silvia Modesto Nassar, “Analysis Of Bayesian Classifier Accuracy” Journal of Computer Science, Vol. 9 Issue. 11, pp. 1487-1495, 2013.

[13] Hyunjung Shin and Sungzoon Cho, “Neighborhood Property–Based Pattern Selection for Support Vector Machines”, Neural Computation, Volume 19 Issue 3, pp. 816-855, 2007.

[14] DavideAnguita , Alessandro Ghio, Sandro Ridella , and Dario Sterpi, “K–Fold Cross Validation for Error Rate Estimate in Support Vector Machines”, Proceedings of The 2009 International Conference on Data Mining (DMIN), pp. 291-297, 2009.

[15] A. Sheik Abdullah, S. Selvakumar, P. Karthikeyan and M. Venkatesh, “Comparing the Efficacy of Decision Tree and its Variants using Medical Data”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 10 Issue. 18, pp 01-08, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.26438/ijcse/v6i12.875878
Published: 2018-12-31

How to Cite

[1]
D. Sathiya and S. V. E. Sonia, “A Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm”, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Eng., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 875–878, Dec. 2018.