Behavior of SVM based classification for varying sizes of heap-grain images

Authors

  • Kamatar VS Department of Computer Science & Engineering, K.L.E. Institute of Technology, Hubli-580030, India
  • Yakkundimath R Department of Computer Science & Engineering, K.L.E. Institute of Technology, Hubli-580030, India
  • Saunshi G Department of Information Science & Engineering, K.L.E. Institute of Technology, Hubli-580030, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i12.3242

Keywords:

Classification, feature extraction, grain samples, support vector machine

Abstract

This paper describes the behavior of support vector machine based classification for varying sizes of heap-grain samples. Different grains like cow peas, green gram, ground nut, green peas, jowar, red gram, soya and toor dal are considered for the study. The color and texture features are used as input to the SVM classifier. The recognition accuracy is observed for specific size training and mixed size training methods. The recognition accuracy is found to be 100% for the test samples with which the classifier is trained and decreased when training and testing samples are different. The work finds application in automatic recognition and classification of food grains by the service robots in the real world.

References

[1] Yuyong Cui, Zhiyuan Zeng and Bitao Fu (2008), Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Compound Kernels of Support Vector Machine , Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, China page. 263-269.

[2] Qing Song, , Wenjie Hu, and Wenfang Xie (2002) ,Robust Support Vector Machine With Bullet Hole Image Classification, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics-Part C:Applications and Reviews, Vol.32. No.4, page.440-448

[3] Li, Jing; Allinson, Nigel; Tao, Dacheng and Li, Xuelong (2006). Multitraining support vector machine for image retrieval, , Vol.15, No,11, page 3597- 3601.

[4] Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Shaul Markovitch, (2004), Text Categorization with Many redundant Features: Using Aggressive Feature Selection to Make SVMs Competitive with C4.5 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning.

[5] Subhransu Maji Alexander C. Berg Jitendra Malik, (2008), Classification using Intersection Kernel Support Vector Machines is efficient, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6] Bhaskar Mehta Saurabh Nangia (2008), Detecting Image Spam using Visual Features and Near Duplicate Detection, WWW 2008.

[7] Amit David, Boaz Lerner (2005), Support vector machine-based image classification for genetic syndrome diagnosis, Pattern Recognition Letters, 2Vol.6, page. 1029–1038.

[8] Reda A. El-Khoribi, (2008) Support Vector Machine Training of HMT Models for Multispectral Image Classification, International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, Vol.8, page 9.

[9] Yasemin Altun, Ioannis Tsochantaridis, Thomas Hofmann, (2003), Hidden Markov Support Vector Machines, Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning.

[10] Corinna Cortes and V. Vapnik, (1995) Support-Vector Networks, Machine Learning, Vol.20, page 273-297

[11] M. Aizerman, E. Braverman, and L. Rozonoer (1964).Theoretical foundations of the potential function method in pattern recognition learning, Automation and Remote Control, Vol.25, page 821-837.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.26438/ijcse/v6i12.3242
Published: 2018-12-31

How to Cite

[1]
V. S. Kamatar, R. Yakkundimath, and G. Saunshi, “Behavior of SVM based classification for varying sizes of heap-grain images”, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Eng., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 32–42, Dec. 2018.

Issue

Section

Research Article