A Semantic Information Analysis Method for Man -Machine Hybrid System Based on Possibilistic Restrictions

Authors

  • Karanjgaonkar J Dept. of Mathematics, Govt. Sukhram Nage College, Nagri, Dist. – Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh- 493778, India
  • Jha P Dept. of Mathematics, Govt. D. K. P.G. College, Baloda-bazar, Chhattisgarh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i9.199203

Keywords:

Hybrid systems, Possibility Distribution, Restriction, Semantic Information

Abstract

Data, information and meaning are three prime characteristics of any communication scenario. Information is generated by data, and the meaning is extracted from information. Search of a mathematical model to measure meaning of communication has become a discipline of study known as semantic information theory. In his recent paper Zadeh claims that information is equivalent to a restriction and it can be represented as probabilistic and possibilistic restrictions. These restrictions can be modified to represent different aspects of communication (content + meaning) in a hybrid system. In present paper we discuss some vital results from our research on possibilistic modelling of semantic information in a hybrid system. We also present a scheme for information analysis system, with various phases, and define measures of information and meaning based on mode of data set and closeness value of possibility and probability distributions. We shall show that this scheme provides a feasible method to capture both information and meaning in hybrid system.

 

References

[1]. F. Dretske, “Knowledge and the Flow of Information.” Blackwell, Oxford, 1981.

[2]. C. E. Shannon, and W. Weaver, “The Mathematical Theory of Communication.” URBANA: University of Illinois Press, Chicago 1949.

[3]. Y. Bar-Hillel, and R. Carnap “Semantic Information.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 4 (14), pp:147–157, 1953.

[4]. R. Seising, “60 Years - A Mathematical Theory of Communication - Towards a Fuzzy Information Theory.” In IFA-EUSFLAT - 2009.

[5]. L. A. Zadeh, “Towards a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU) - an outline.” Information Sciences, Vol. 172, pp 1–40, 2005.

[6]. D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Default Reasoning and Possibility Theory.” Artificial Intelligence, Vol.35, pp 243–257, 1988.

[7]. D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Fuzzy sets, probability and measurement.” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 40, pp 135–154, 1989.

[8]. R. R. Yager, “A foundation for a theory of possibility. “ Journal of Cybernetics, Vol. 10, pp:1–3, 1980.

[9]. J. Karanjgaonkar, and P. Jha, “On a Novel Method to Measure Semantic Information through Possibilistic Restrictions”, IOSR Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 13(5), pp 32-36, 2017.

[10]. J. Karanjgaonkar, and P. Jha, “Possibilistic Analysis of Uncertainty and Vagueness in Semantic Communication”, International Journal of Research and Analytic Reviews, Vol. 5(3), pp 309-312, 2018

[11]. G. Shafer, “A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.” Princeton University Press, NJ, 1976.

[12]. R. R. Yager, “Uncertainty representation using fuzzy measures”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 32(1), pp:13–20, 2002.

[13]. D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Evidence Measures Based on Fuzzy Information.” Automatica, Vol. 21(5), pp :547–562, 1985.

[14]. D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Properties of Measures of Information in Evidence and Possibility Theories.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 24, pp 161–182, 1987.

[15]. L. A. Zadeh. “Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility.” Fuzzy Sets & Systems, Vol 1, pp 3–78, 1978a.

[16]. L. A. Zadeh, “Towards a restriction centred theory of truth and meaning.” Information Sciences, Vol. 248, pp 1–14, 2013.

[17]. L. A. Zadeh, “The Information Principle.” Information Sciences, Vol. 294, pp 540–549, 2015.

[18]. R. R. Yager, “On the Specificity of a possibility Distribution.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.50 pp 279–292, 1992.

[19]. D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Fuzzy sets and statistical data.” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 25, pp 345–356, 1986.

[20]. L. A. Zadeh, “Precisiated natural language (PNL).” AI Magazine, Vol. 25(3), pp 74 – 91, 2004.

[21]. L. A. Zadeh, “Toward a Perception - Based Theory of Probabilistic Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 105, pp 233 – 264, 2002.

[22]. L. A. Zadeh, “From computing with numbers to computing with words - from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions.” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, Vol 45(1), pp 105–119, 1999.

[23]. L. A. Zadeh, “PRUF - a Meaning Representation Language for Natural Languages.” Int. Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 10, pp 395–460, 1978b.

[24]. D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Practical Methods for Constructing Possibility Distributions.” International Journal of Intelligent System, Vol.31, pp 215-239, 2016.

[25]. S.S. Pawar, R.H. Kulkarni, "A Advanced Approach To Construct E-Learning QA System", International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.6, Issue.8, pp.80-83, 2018.

[26]. M. Spott, “A Theory of Possibility Distributions.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 102, pp:135–155, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.26438/ijcse/v6i9.199203
Published: 2018-09-30

How to Cite

[1]
J. Karanjgaonkar and P. Jha, “A Semantic Information Analysis Method for Man -Machine Hybrid System Based on Possibilistic Restrictions”, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Eng., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 199–203, Sep. 2018.

Issue

Section

Research Article