Ranking Prediction for Cloud Services from The Past Usages
Keywords:
Cloud Service, Quality Of Service, Cloud Rank, Personalized ServiceAbstract
Web services are loosely-coupled software systems considered hold up interoperable machine-to-machine communication over a system. The most undemanding approach personalized cloud service quality of service ranking is to assess the entire service candidates at user side and position services base on observed values of quality of service. The materialization of web services has produces unprecedented prospect for organizations to setup additional agile as well as versatile collaborations with other organizations. Comparable to established component-based systems, cloud applications normally entail numerous cloud components that communicate over application programming interface. To attack this crucial challenge, we put forward a personalized ranking prediction structure, named cloud Rank to forecast quality of service ranking concerning a set of cloud services devoid of requiring extra real-world service invocations from the projected users. The target users of cloud rank structure are cloud applications, which require personalized cloud service ranking in support of building selection of optimal service.
References
G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York, “Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 76–80, 2003.
N. N. Liu and Q. Yang, “Eigenrank: a ranking-oriented approach to collaborative filtering,” in Proc. 31st Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. On Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’08), 2008, pp. 83–90.
H. Ma, I. King, and M. R. Lyu, “Effective missing data prediction for collaborative filtering,” in Proc. 30th Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. On Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’07), 2007, pp. 39–46.
J. Marden, Analyzing and Modeling Ranking Data. Chapman & Hall, New York, 1995.
P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl, “Grouplens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews,” in Proc. of ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1994, pp. 175–186.
B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl, “Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms,” in Proc. 10th Int’l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW’01), 2001, pp. 285–295.
J. Wu, L. Chen, Y. Feng, Z. Zheng, M. Zhou, and Z. Wu, “Predicting qos for service selection by neighborhood-based collaborative filtering,” IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, to appear.
C. Yang, B. Wei, J. Wu, Y. Zhang, and L. Zhang, “Cares: a rankingoriented cadal recommender system,” in Proc. 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries (JCDL’09), 2009, pp. 203–212.
T. Yu, Y. Zhang, and K.-J. Lin, “Efficient algorithms for Web services selection with end-to-end QoS constraints,” ACM Trans. the Web, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2007.
L. Zeng, B. Benatallah, A. H. Ngu, M. Dumas, J. Kalagnanam, and H. Chang, “QoS-aware middleware for Web services composition,” IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 311–327, 2004.
Z. Zheng and M. R. Lyu, “WS-DREAM: A distributed reliability assessment mechanism for Web services,” in Proc. 38th Int’l Conf. Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN’08), 2008, pp. 392–397.
Z. Zheng, H. Ma, M. R. Lyu, and I. King, “WSRec: A collaborative filtering based Web service recommender system,” in Proc. 7th Int’l Conf. Web Services (ICWS’09), 2009, pp. 437–444.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
