Drag Force Coefficient for Various Shapes of Cooling Tower Subjected to Wind Load

Authors

  • Krishna Kumar S Department of Structural Engineering, PRIST University, Thanjavur, India
  • Pravin Kumar S Department of Structural Engineering, PRIST University, Thanjavur, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i5.178182

Keywords:

Hyperbolic Cooling Tower, Static Pressure, Drag Force

Abstract

Hyperbolic cooling tower is a tall structure with thin shells subjected to dead load, wind load and ground motion. In absence of ground motion, wind becomes the major factor. In this study three models with different profiles were modelled using Catia and analyzed in Ansys to find drag force and drag coefficient. The results of the models were compared with conventional hyperbolic profile cooling tower. It was found that CT – 2 (Part of the structure has hyperbolic profile and other part is parallel to the vertical axis) has less effect due to wind. The Drag Coefficient of CT – 3 is least when compared to other models but projected area is high, which leads to increase in drag force. The drag force of CT – 2 is 83.2% of conventional cooling tower. Therefore CT – 2 profile is recommended when compared to other profiles.

References

G. Murali, et al., “Response of Cooling Towers to Wind Loads” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Vol. 7, No. 1, Jan 2012.

Tejas, et al., “Effect of Wind Loading on Analysis of Natural Draught Hyperbolic Cooling Tower”, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-4 Issue-1, October 2014.

N. Prashanth, et al., “To Study the Effect of Seismic and Wind Loads on Hyperbolic Cooling Tower of Varying Dimension and RCC Shell Thickness”, The International Journal of Science & Technologies (ISSN 2321 – 919X).

Bolishetti Chaitanya, S Sunil Pratap Reddy, Muchakurthi Karthik, “An Experimental Investigation on Effect of High Temperatures on Steel”, International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.5, Issue.9, pp.156-163, 2017.

Ferrybridge Cooling Tower Collapse – Case Study.

Athira C R, et al., “Linear and Nonlinear Performance Evaluation and Design of Cooling Tower at Dahej”, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE).

Akhil Nema, et al., “Parametric Earthquake Analysis of Natural Draught Hyperbolic Cooling Tower”, International Journal of Engineering Research Volume No.5, Issue Special 1, pp : 143- 148

IS 11504 – “Indian standard code of practice for of Structural Design of Reinforced Concrete Natural Draught Cooling Towers”, Indian Standard Institution.

IS 875 (1987), “Indian standard code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for building and structures, Part 3, Wind loads”, Indian Standard Institution.

IS 456 – 2000 Plain And Reinforced Concrete - Code Of Practice.

BS 4485 (1975), “British standard for water cooling towers, Part 4, Code of practice for structural design and construction” ,British Standard Institution.

https://matzagusto.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/vibrationdamages-towers-case-ferrybridge-cooling-towers-collapse

http://www.risktec.co.uk/knowledge-bank/technical-articles/blownaway--the-end-of-chapelcross-cooling-towers-.aspx

Downloads

Published

2025-11-13
CITATION
DOI: 10.26438/ijcse/v6i5.178182
Published: 2025-11-13

How to Cite

[1]
S. Krishna Kumar and S. Pravin Kumar, “Drag Force Coefficient for Various Shapes of Cooling Tower Subjected to Wind Load”, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Eng., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 178–183, Nov. 2025.

Issue

Section

Research Article