Image Based User Experience (UX) Factor Analysis- Mobile Phone Perspective

Authors

  • Morshed I College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211106, China
  • Shi H Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211106, China
  • Jafreen S Department of Statistics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1209, Bangladesh
  • Seraj Al Mahmud Mostafa School of Computing, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 59717, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i4.3136

Keywords:

User Experience Factor, Button Size, Android Package Kit, PPI, DPI

Abstract

This paper mainly assesses original image used within a mobile application to understand the differences and comparing them with the standard size. The purpose is to predict success rate of mobile applications prior availability to its customer. To do so, we considered sizes of Android based application which can be improved for the ease of user friendliness. In android package kit (.apk) the buttons are usually (.png) files where the size may differ based on various screen perspective. An application is developed to find and compare the existing button size found in a mobile application to the respective standard in terms of User Experience (UX) factor. Initially, the result in this work will produce a statistic for developers to compare button standard with the original standard and finally produce a generic overview to get a probable success rate with other products in the market. The main finding of this work are, consider an agile based approach during development including revising the developed applications if required before the final release to their user and to overcome the standard of the design issue in terms of standard button measurements with similar products.

References

[1] V.K. Gujare, P. Malviya “Android Malicious apps and Malware

Security: A Review”, International Journal of Computer Sciences and

Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue.,4, pp.43-47, 2016

[2] Zaihasriah Zahidi, Yan Peng Lim, Peter Charles Woods: Understanding

the user experience (UX) factors that influence user satisfaction in

digital culture heritage online collections for non-expert users, Science

and Information Conference, London (2014)

[3] Sari Kujala et al.: UX Curve: A method for evaluating long-term user

experience. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 23, No. 5 (2011)

[4] appannie.com: App Annie works with UX factor and offers prior app

evaluation, [Online]. Available: https://www.appannie.com/ (Accessed

on 4th November 2017)

[5] developer.android.com: Android Developers report on screen

support,[Online].Available:https://developer.android.com/guide/practice

s/screens-support.html (Accessed on 4th November 2017)

[6] Cho, B., Lee, S., Xu, M., Ji, S., Kim, T., Kim, J.: Prevention of Cross-

update Privacy Leaks on Android. Computer Science and Information

Systems, Vol. 15, No. 1. (2018)

[7] Mastering the Iteration: An Agile White Paper, Dean Leffingwell, Rally

Software Development Corporation (2007)

[8] Robert Holler: Five Myths of Agile Development, The Agile

Management Company, V1-0210 (2010)

[9] Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan

Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden: Uncomfortable user

experience. Communications of the ACM, 56(9):66 – 73 (2013)

[10] Frank Bentley and Edward Barrett: Building Mobile Experiences. MIT

Press(2012)

[11] Bederson, B.B., Grosjean, J. and Meyer, J.: Toolkit Design for

Interactive Structured Graphics. IEEE Trans. Soft-Eng., Vol. 30, No. 8,

pp.535-546 (2004)

[12] Semantic Studios: User Experience Design, [Online]. Available:

http://semanticstudios.com/user_experience_design/ (Accessed on 4th

November, 2017)

[13] J. Meyerson, P. Galloway, and R. Bias: Improving the user experience

of professional researchers: Applying a user-centered design framework

in archival repositories. In Proceedings of the 2012 American Society

for Information Science and Technology Vol. 49, No. 1. (2013)

[14] Brewster, S.A.: Overcoming the lack of screen space on mobile

computers, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6, 3, 188-205 (2002)

[15] Pekka Parhi, Amy K. Karlson, Benjamin B. Bederson: Target Size

Study for One-Handed Thumb Use on Small Touchscreen Devices.

Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with

mobile devices and services. PP.203-210, Espoo, Finland (2006)

[16] Colle, H.A., and Hiszem, K.J. Standing at a kiosk: effects of key size

and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user

experience. Ergonomics, 47, 13, 1406-1423 (2004)

[17] Karlson, A.K., Bederson, B.B. and SanGiovanni, J. AppLens and

LaunchTile: two designs for one-handed thumb use on small devices.

Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press, 201-210 (2005)

[18] Margaret Rouse: Definition of pixels, [Online].

Available:http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/pixel (Accessed on 3rd

July 2017)

[19] Sebastien Gabriel: Designers guide to DPI, [Online].

Available:http://sebastien-gabriel.com/designers-guide-to-dpi/dpi

(Accessed on 31st August 2017)

[20] Sebastien Gabriel: Designers guide to DPI, [Online].

Available:http://sebastien-gabriel.com/designers-guide-to-dpi/ppi-

setting (Accessed on 31st August 2017)

[21] t-table: provided by San Jose State University, USA,

[Online].Available:http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/gerstman/StatPrimer/t-

table.pdf (Accessed on 29th November 2017)

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.26438/ijcse/v6i4.3136
Published: 2018-04-30

How to Cite

[1]
I. Morshed, H. Shi, S. Jafreen, and S. A. M. Mostafa, “Image Based User Experience (UX) Factor Analysis- Mobile Phone Perspective”, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Eng., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 31–36, Apr. 2018.

Issue

Section

Research Article