A Comparative Study of Containers for Live Migration in Cloud Computing Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i3.321326Keywords:
Cloud Computing, Containers, High-Performance Computing, Live Migration, VirtualizationAbstract
Cloud computing, a modern world technology ensures that the resources are efficiently utilized, provisioned and are available all the time. When one virtual machine is running on one host and then urge rises to migrate that Virtual Machine to some other host on the same or different network; then live migration of Virtual Machines comes into the picture. In the simple live migration of processes, applications or virtual machines, process as well as operating system, on which the machine is operating needs to be migrated. But with the introduction of containers in the cloud computing, migration process becomes easy and less complex. Now, only the process or the virtual machine is only migrated to another host, regardless of the underlying operating system. Containers had made migration process easy because they contain inbuilt operating system in them. In this paper, we are going to review different containers that are used in the live migration of virtual machines.
References
C. Computing and I. Dublin, “Inter-Cloud application migration and portability using Linux containers for better resource provisioning and interoperability Ivin polo sony,” no. September 2015.
R. Buyya, “Market-oriented cloud computing: Vision, hype, and the reality of delivering computing as the 5th utility,” 2009 9th IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. Clust. Comput. Grid, CCGRID 2009, vol. 25, no. 6, p. 1, 2009.
P. Barham, B. Dragovic, K. Fraser, S. Hand, T. Harris, A. Ho, R. Neugebauer, I. Pratt, and A. Warfield, “Xen and the art of virtualization,” Proc. Ninet. ACM Symp. Oper. Syst. Princ. - SOSP ’03, p. 164, 2003.
R. Dua, A. R. Raja, and D. Kakadia, “Virtualization vs containerization to support PaaS,” Proc. - 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. Cloud Eng. IC2E 2014, pp. 610–614, 2014.
O. Laadan and J. Nieh, “Operating system virtualization,” Proc. 3rd Annu. Haifa Exp. Syst. Conf. - SYSTOR ’10, p. 1, 2010.
S. Osman, D. Subhraveti, G. Su, and J. Nieh, “The design and implementation of Zap: a system for migrating computing environments,” SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., vol. 36, no. SI, pp. 361–376, 2002.
M. G. Xavier, M. V. Neves, F. D. Rossi, T. C. Ferreto, T. Lange, and C. A. F. De Rose, “Performance Evaluation of Container-Based Virtualization for High-Performance Computing Environments,” 2013 21st Euromicro Int. Conf. Parallel, Distrib. Network-Based Process., pp. 233–240, 2013.
F. Romero and T. J. Hacker, “Live migration of parallel applications with OpenVZ,” Proc. - 25th IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Inf. Netw. Appl. Work. WAINA 2011, pp. 526–531, 2011.
S. Nadgowda, S. Suneja, N. Bila, and C. Isci, “Voyager: Complete Container State Migration,” Proc. - Int. Conf. Distrib. Comput. Syst., no. Section III, pp. 2137–2142, 2017.
A. Mirkin, A. Kuznetsov, and K. Kolyshkin, “Containers checkpointing and live migration,” 2008 Linux Symp., pp. 1–8, 2008.
L. Zhang, J. Litton, F. Cangialosi, T. Benson, D. Levin, and A. Mislove, “Picocenter,” Proc. Elev. Eur. Conf. Comput. Syst. - EuroSys ’16, no. Llmi, pp. 1–16, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
