Efficient Mobility Using Multicast Routing Mechanisms

Authors

  • V. Ganesh Babu Government College for Women, Maddur, Mandya 571 428, Karnataka

Keywords:

handover, heterogeneity, deployable, Mobile IP

Abstract

One of the most important metrics in the design of IP mobility protocols is the handover performance. Handover occurs when a mobile node changes its network point-of attachment from one access router to another. If not performed efficiently, handover delays, jitters and packet loss directly impact and disrupt applications and services. With the Internet growth and heterogeneity, it becomes crucial to design efficient handover protocols that are scalable, robust and incrementally deployable. The current Mobile IP (MIP) standard has been shown to exhibit poor handover performance. Most other work attempts to modify MIP to slightly improve its efficiency, while others propose complex techniques to replace MIP.

References

. A. Helmy, "A Multicast-based Protocol for IP Mobility Support", ACM Second International Workshop on Networked Group Communication (NGC 2000), ACM SIGCOMMsponsored, Palo Alto, November 2000.

. C. Perkins, "IP Mobility Support", RFC 2002, Internet Engineering Task Force, October 1996.

. C. Perkins, D. Johnson, "Route Optimization in Mobile IP", Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, February 2000.

. C. Perkins and D. Johnson, "Mobility Support in IPv6",Proceedings of MobiCom"96, November 1996.

. J. Mysore, V. Bharghavan, "A New Multicasting-based Architecture for Internet Host Mobility", roceedings of ACM MobiCom, September 1997.

. S. Seshan, H. Balakrishnan, R. Katz, "Handovers in Cellular Wireless Networks: The Daedalus Implementation and Experience", Kluwer Journal on Wireless Networks, 1995.

. S. Kumar, P. Radoslavov, D. Thaler, C. Alaettinoglu, D. Estrin, M. Handley, "The MASC/BGMP Architecture for Interdomain Multic.

. L. Breslau, D. Estrin, K. Fall, S. Floyd, J. Heidemann, A. Helmy, P. Huang, S. McCanne, K. Varadhan, Y. Xu, H. Yu, "Advances in Network Simulation", IEEE Computer, vol. 33, No. 5, p. 59-67, May 2000.

. E. Gustafsson, A. Jonsson, C. Perkins, Mobile IP Regional Registration, Internet-draft, draft-ietf-mobileip-reg-tunnel-02, March 2000.

. R. Ramjee, T. La Porta, L. Salgarelli, S. Thuel, K. Varadhan, L. Li, "IP-based access network infrastructure for next-generation wireless data networks", IEEE Personal Communications, Volume: 7 Issue: 4, Page(s): 34 "41, Aug. 2000.

. R. Hinden, S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture", Internet Draft, draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-06.txt, July 2001.

. R. Hinden, M. O`Dell, S. Deering, "An IPv6 Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Format", RFC 2374, July 1998.

. A. Helmy, "State Analysis and Aggregation Study for Multicast-based Micro Mobility", IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), May 2002.

. A. Snoeren, H. Balakrishnan, "An End-to-End Approach to Host Mobility", Accepted to ACM MobiCom "00, August 2000.

Downloads

Published

2013-11-30

How to Cite

[1]
V. G. Babu, “Efficient Mobility Using Multicast Routing Mechanisms”, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Eng., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 39–46, Nov. 2013.